Your Webcomic on the Silver Screen

Okay, let's assume that at some your webcomic gets some interest from Hollywood. It can happen; they have to get away from regular comics at some point and start exploring the web, right? Besides being a great boost to any comic's profit margin, as well as its popularity, this means that you will need to make a number of major decisions in very short order. Of course, it helps to have an idea what those decisions are.

Plot Details
The major change is that there will be changes going from comic to movie. The majority of these changes is simply because things that work well in comics don't always translate well. This can be anything from costumes to too many characters to lengthy exposition; comics done well are great literature, and that doesn't always translate well into a more visual medium like the movies. Yeah, go figure. Costume and exposition are usually the first to go; lengthy dialogue that works in a comic gets bowing when it is actually filmed, and not all costumes look right on-screen. Generally, this means Spandex and flowing costumes just look weird, which is why Spider-man seems to be wearing armor rather than just cloth.

Sometimes there are also character issues, as a comic has too many of the same type of character, so someone needs to be dropped. At the other end is that at least one character has to be the protagonist and another has to be an antagonist. Movies tend to do well when it comes to high drama; anything subtle tends to get lost. Movies are notoriously bad at showing emotions and nuances that work well in a book. As such there needs to be a conflict of some sort and one that is easy to film.

Avoid Marketing
You will also need to debate how much you will listen to the marketing department. A movie is not a cheap undertaking; even a low-budget movie can easily run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Understandably producers get a little antsy when it comes to making sure that the movie sees a return of some sort, and some take that to an extreme. Product placement is one option, where a company will pay to have its product featured in the movie. Although it can get annoying if abused, it is a traditional way to finance a picture.

Other options to pursue are ensuring that there is a game or other swag to merchandise; for some movies this is fine, but for others it just doesn't work. A subtle drama or even a slapstick comedy is unlikely to have much merchandise attached to it, while a kids movie or superhero may have a lot of merchandise attached to it. The producer needs to decide on whether or not to develop the merchandise or to allow another company to do so through a license. Keep in mind that this can include anything from toys to posters to a fashion line, so debate swag a long time before passing it over.

However, be wary of allowing the marketing department to make any creative decisions. The marketing department is always looking for ways to make the movie more profitable, which is fine as it their job, but some of those ideas involve making changes to the script, usually to better facilitate a product line or specific product. These ideas should be slapped down; the movie, from a profit perspective needs to manage a fine balance between creative and marketing, and there is an issue when that balance swings to much towards the profit side. To put it another way, there needs to be just enough marketing within the movie to make it profitable without the movie becoming an extended commercial.

Producers Produce
The other major issue is that the producer may interfere with the creative process. He can be so worried about the movie being a success that he decides he needs to add in more commercial elements to make the movie "more accessible". Others decide that they need to leave a personal mark on the movie and so take over. If this happens, the producer needs to be taken out and shot. Leaving a "personal mark" invariably means that something has to be changed or eliminated in order to insert that mark, and that usually hurts the movie. At he same time, more commercial elements may cheapen the movie or eliminate why the movie worked so well in the first place. As such, a producer should stick to financing the movie and avoid being creative.

That should help start things off. Casting is an issue that really needs its own space, and so it shall be.... 

Building a Living Fantasy World II

Since this a comic, let’s start with visuals. They are the part that will catch everyone’s attention and it also means that you can give the artist something to work on. This means that you need to make a lot of minor decisions that are going to add up quickly. So let’s go through those decisions.

Era: This is one of the two most important decisions to make right off the bat. An era is defined by a combination of its time, location, and moral outlook. When you decide to emulate the era, you are making a decision as to what people will be dressing , what the architecture will look like, and what beliefs are common among the people of your comic. Examples of decent eras are the Meijing Era of Japan, the Victorian Era of England, and the Pre-Civil War Era of the South. See how each of those phrases evoked a mood just by mentioning them? You can also define your own era, so just you know what makes it work.

 You need to decide which era you are attempting to emulate, even if it’s a combination of eras. The era will define what technology is available, at least in a general sense. It also tends to define the clothing and other stylistic traits. You also need to debate how closely you will follow the era; a historical fiction will follow the era closely, whereas a more magical setting may not follow the era more than accepting its basic. Of special note is “indeterminate tech”, which is ostensibly a medieval setting, but high technology seems to be easily accessible if you know where to look, such as laser rifle disguised as a musket or even some sort of sensing device.

Geography: You have two basic choices here: The first choice is that the entire comic happens in roughly the same kind of geography, such as rolling, forested hills, or a huge desert, or even a large city. This is great if you are making some sort of point about ecology or just want a simpler geography to deal with. At the other extreme is a more realistic geography, which is one that has a number of different zones, such as mountains here, desert there, even some forest and plains; it’s just more interesting, but harder to draw. Keep in mind that even space has its own geography, ranging from asteroid belts to dead space to areas full of plasma.

You can also be a lot more exotic, such as a planet that is a whole tree to one that is a broken up bits of land. Your planet can even be a living being or nothing but sea with maybe a few islands. Have fun with the geography, but be advised that you need to know what makes it special from the beginning with an option explain why it it is the way it is. Just remember to be consistent and you can have all of the fun you want.

These should be two of the first things you worry about. But they are just the first…

Building a Living Fantasy World I

One of the problems with most fantasy worlds is that they are not places you want to live in. Beyond the usual hygiene issues, the problem is that they were set up in a rush with more worries for literary issues than anything else. Because of this it may help to take a step backwards and look at the world in general.

The first point to look at is whether you need to look at in micro or macro. Looking at the world in macro is a pretty good idea if you are doing something epic or legendary; you need to know how the world works as a whole before you make major changes in it. On the other hand, it helps to look the smaller details if you writing a coming of age story or something personal. If you are looking at in micro, all you need to establish is where the food comes from, what the hierarchy the person needs to worry, and what the person does for a living. It really is that simple, but you will also have limited range of stories to worry about as well.

Let’s look at the micro view for a moment. If you are just interested in a limited story, you need to avoid nobles and any military above the rank of company captain. Nobles do not work for small stories, especially if it’s a fantasy world; they are just too rare and therefore important to how the world works so they cannot be used in small stories. The higher the rank of the noble, the more you need to have a story that uses him. This is why Disney princesses are usually involved in major stories; if you are going to use someone that rare you simply don’t waste that person’s presence in a small story. The same applies to any high-ranking military officer; the scope of their command usually justifies a much greater role. This is not to say you can’t use them in small stories, just realize that it may come off as strange; you wouldn’t send a hero of the realm to go after a small minnow, after all.

You also need to establish where the food comes from. It may sound trivial, but in a medieval environment that will an extremely important detail. Even if it’s just fish or grain it is important to establish that there is a food source. If you don’t, then you establish that there is some sort of famine, and that’s just as important. Either way you establish something important about your environment. You also need to establish what job the characters have as that also adds to environment, especially given the difference between status level when it comes to things like who gets priority when it comes to protection, food, or decent living quarters.

In short, you need to establish just enough that it’s a real world. And this level of detail is required just to make a short story. Imagine the level of detail you’re going to need for something bigger…

Is feminism hurting comics?

The “Women vs. Tropes” video caused a major splash a few weeks ago. The basic question is whether or not video games are serving the interests of women gamers, and the answer was probably not. Whether or not that was a good thing depended on your perspective on the games themselves as the answer got a little complicated. Some of the same basic questions need to be asked when it comes to comics.

Let’s break this down to three issues, as these seem to come up the most: costumes, Women In Refrigerators, and women in second place. Although both men and women are dressed skimpily, our perspective on that changes depending on the gender of the character. With men, it’s a power fantasy, as men like to see powerfully built men and for women it’s because guys like to see scantily clad women. It’s interesting that the choices are based as if gay or female readers don’t exist; I understand the logic, as men are the majority of readers, but it just feels weird. And I definitely understand why the charges of skimpy clothing; there is no way you can convince any intelligent person that some of those costumes (Witchblade, I’m ogling you!) are anything less than exploitive.

However...There’s an interesting problem. Yeah, some costumes are exploitive, but that’s the point; if you’re going to have men use their charm and appearance as their power, you need to allow women to do the same. It’s also representative of a healthy sexuality to dress as the person desires, and we all know men and women that dress to make the most of their charms; that needs to be represented in our heroes as well. We need characters like Vampirella as well as Wonder Woman; some characters dress that way to seduce and others because they are just comfortable that way. Diana dresses that way because it allows her to fight more effectively just as Vampirella dresses that way because she bloody well can; both should be allowed to dress how it works for them.

I just think that women should be allowed to dress as appropriate for the character regardless of political correctness. By placing limitations on women’s wardrobes that we aren’t on men’s places creative limits on illustrators, and I’m not sure if that’s a good thing. I know it’s weird to argue that running around in skimpy costumes JUST LIKE THE MEN is something that needs to be allowed, but it is something that should be at least debated. Otherwise we’re placing restraints on women that we aren’t on men, and that just doesn’t seem fair.

Women in Refirgerators started off as a decent idea. Originally it was legitimately pointing out that women were being treated unfairly, and that women needed to be treated as more than mere objects. However, somewhere along the way it morphed into a listing of bad things that happened to women. When it did that, it morphed into something completely different; a number of fans asked how that supported women’s rights, especially when men suffered so much more. Sure, you can argue that women are raped, but so are men in the comics; the list of men that were sexually assaulted is not a short one. Even Spiderman was molested as a boy!

Having such a list has an unfortunate side effect: It has a chilling effect on what creators can do with women. Women can no longer be the target of an attack, or it gets listed on the website. As such some of the greatest character scenes would never happened, such as Batgirl becoming Oracle, and some characters, such as Jean Grey are simply impossible. This kind of list limits creators by limiting what they can do with their creations; they cannot do anything really bad to the women characters or it pops on the list and the creators become listed as sexist.

Now, if we had been debating this a decade ago, I would not be arguing that women characters are up there with the guys. I was debating ignoring DC for a moment, but it has the most problems. Wonder Woman needs to have her own movie, period, and they need to have more female lead characters. In an industry full of incredible, deep female characters, where women lead teams, have their own comics, and basically rock even in the movies, DC has so many issues when it comes to its female characters that it needs to debate its hiring practices. I know that there is a dearth of female creators and that definitely needs to change, but DC needs to have more women characters, and it needs to happen ASAP.

Now I’m not saying that feminists need to go back into the woodwork by any stretch; someone needs to start a fire under the collective butts of DC comics. And I agree that there is a lot of work to be done. But at the same time they do need to back off a step, or we’re going to have supers in nothing but committee-approved Victorian dress to insure that nothing ever bad happens to them. At the same time, I think that the gains that have been accomplished need to be strengthened. It’s basic tactics; every so often you need to stop charging down the mine shaft and build up the supports. We also need to find a way to encourage more girls to become writers and illustrators; we don’t have enough and that needs to change. The pressure just needs to be let up a bit.

And is anyone else smiling when you picture Gail Simone literally lighting a fire under the DC execs?